Global prevalence of low resilience among the general population and health professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic: A meta-analysis
Pien L.-C., Chu H., Lin H.-C., Liu D., Chen R., Chang C.-Y., Jen H.-J., Janitra F.E., Banda K.J., Lai Y.-J., Chou K.-R., Lee T.-Y.
Abstract
Objective: To estimate the global prevalence of low resilience among the general population and health professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: Embase, Ovid-MEDLINE, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, WHO COVID-19 databases, and grey literature were searched for studies from January 1, 2020, to August 22, 2022. Hoy's assessment tool was used to assess for risk of bias. Meta-analysis and moderator analysis was performed using the Generalized Linear Mixed Model with a corresponding 95 % confidence interval (95 % CI) adopting the random-effect model in R software. Between-study heterogeneity was measured using I<sup>2</sup> and τ<sup>2</sup> statistics. Results: Overall, 44 studies involving 51,119 participants were identified. The pooled prevalence of low resilience was 27.0 % (95 % CI: 21.0 %–33.0 %) with prevalence among the general population being 35.0 % (95 % CI: 28.0 %–42.0 %) followed by 23.0 % (95 % CI: 16.0 %–30.9 %) for health professionals. The 3-month trend analysis of the prevalence of low resilience beginning January 2020 to June 2021 revealed upward then downward patterns among overall populations. The prevalence of low resilience was higher in females, studied during the delta variant dominant period, frontline health professionals, and undergraduate degree education. Limitations: Study outcomes showed high heterogeneity; however, sub-group and meta-regression analyses were conducted to identify potential moderating factors. Conclusions: Globally, 1 out of 4 people among the general population and health professionals experienced low resilience due to COVID-19 adversity. The prevalence of low resilience was twice as much among the general population compared to health professionals. These findings provide information for policymakers and clinicians in the development and implementation of resilience-enhancing programs.
The relationship between frontline nurses' psychosocial status, satisfaction with life and resilience during the prevalence of COVID-19 disease
Dehghan M., Hossini Rafsanjanipoor S.M., Zakeri M., Zakeri M.A.
Global prevalence and associated risk factors of posttraumatic stress disorder during COVID-19 pandemic: A meta-analysis
Chou K.-R., Chou K.-R., Chou K.-R., Chou K.-R., Chu H., Chu H., Jen H.-J., Jen H.-J., Kamil A.R., Kang X.L., Kang X.L., Pien L.-C., Pien L.-C., Tsai H.-T., Yunitri N., Yunitri N.
Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on mental health in the general population: A systematic review
Chen-Li D., Gill H., Ho R., Ho R., Iacobucci M., Lipsitz O., Lui L.M.W., Majeed A., McIntyre R.S., McIntyre R.S., McIntyre R.S., Nasri F., Phan L., Xiong J., Chen-Li D., Gill H., Ho R., Ho R., Iacobucci M., Lipsitz O., Lui L.M.W., Majeed A., McIntyre R.S., McIntyre R.S., McIntyre R.S., Nasri F., Phan L., Xiong J.
Prevalence of mental health problems during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Jia X., Jia X., Niu J., Shi H., Wang X., Wang X., Wu T., Xie J., Yin X.
Tracking SARS-CoV-2 Variants
WHO
Prevalence of high resilience in old age and association with perceived threat of covid-19—results from a representative survey
Lobner M., Pabst A., Reininghaus U., Reininghaus U., Reininghaus U., Riedel-Heller S.G., Rohr S., Rohr S., Weitzel E.C.
Development and psychometric evaluation of the Resilience Scale.
Wagnild G.M., Young H.M., Wagnild G.M., Young H.M.
Psychometric validity and reliability of the 10- and 2-item Connor–Davidson resilience scales among a national sample of Americans responding to the Covid-19 pandemic: an item response theory analysis
Baker B.M., Baxter R.D., Bennett M.M., Bennett M.M., McAuliffe M.P., McAuliffe M.P., Mohr D.C., Mohr D.C., Pogue J.R., Pogue J.R., Waddimba A.C., Waddimba A.C., Warren A.M., Warren A.M.
Resilience and mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic
Amoretti S., Bernardo M., Garcia-Rizo C., Hogg B., Hogg B., Hogg B., Martinez-Aran A., Mezquida G., Montejo L., Pacchiarotti I., Rabelo-da-Ponte F.D., Rabelo-da-Ponte F.D., Radua J., Radua J., Radua J., Rosa A.R., Rosa A.R., Sole B., Torrent C., Vallespir C., Verdolini N., Vieta E.
Impacts of COVID-19: A research agenda to support people in their fight
Venkatesh V.
Chiang K.-J., Chen R., Wang C.-H., Janitra F.E., Banda K.J., Sung C.-M., Wibawa Y.A., Chou K.-R.
International Journal of Nursing Studies
Zhang Y.
International Journal of Imaging Systems and Technology
Calero P., Milo R.B., Suarez C., Gomez E., Connelly C.D.
Sage Open Nursing
Sarid A., Gilat-Yihyie S., Tutian R., Kalman-Halevi M., Sarid M.
Healthcare Switzerland
Braeken M.A.K.A., Bogaerts A., Van Haeken S., Groenen A.
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Low L.L., Seah S.S.Y., Tan C.Y.F., Teo C.W., Ong P.W., Leong D.Q.X.
Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
Chen H., Zhou J., Li S., Liu C., Li Q., Zhu C.
American Journal of Health Behavior
Burnett H.J., Saw L., Bailey K.G.D.
North American Journal of Psychology
Gesesew H.A., Musker M., Gebremariam K., Tekle D., Tesema A.G., Woldegiorgis M., Tesfamicael K.G., Gebremedhin A., Tesfay F.H., Atey T.M., Hailu S., Miruts K., Mwanri L., Ward P.
Journal of Affective Disorders
Jocic D.
Vojnosanitetski Pregled
