Construction of students' mathematical knowledge in the zone of proximal development and zone of potential construction

Kusmaryono I., Kusumaningsih W., Jupriyanto

Abstract

This article highlights the main ideas that underlie the differences in potential pragmatic knowledge constructs students experience when solving problems, between the zone of proximal development (ZPD) and the zone of potential construction (ZPC). This qualitative research is based on a phenomenological approach to finding the meaning of things that are fundamental and essential from the ZPD and ZPC phenomena. Researchers observed mathematics learning by a teacher on 24 fourth-grade students who were divided into groups A (high IQ) and B (low IQ). Data collection through tests, observation, and interviews. While the validity of the data is done through triangulation of methods and triangulation of sources. The results showed that students of the Upper (A) group had high IQ but small ZPD and ZPC. In contrast, students in the Lower (B) group have low IQ but large ZPD and ZPC. This result means that intelligence (IQ) is measured not only logically-mathematically but also in the verbal-linguistic and spatial-visual fields. The conclusion is that there are differences in the construction of students' knowledge in the learning zone. This difference occurs because the knowledge constructs that the students have previously had an effect on the accommodation process of the schemes that students have built while in the proximal development zone (ZPD) where scaffolding works. Meanwhile, the potential construction zone (ZPC) is not sufficient to describe the real development of students. However, it only reflects what students have accomplished.

Journal
European Journal of Educational Research
Page Range
341-351
Publication date
2021
Total citations
Understanding mathematical development through Vygotsky

Walshaw M.

Radical constructivism: A way of knowing and learning

von Glasersfeld E.

Scaffolding Student Understanding in Small-Group Work: Students’ Uptake of Teacher Support in Subsequent Small-Group Interaction

Mercer N., van de Pol J., van de Pol J., Volman M.

Zone proximal development gives a new meaning to the students’ intelligence in statistical method lesson

Tinungki G. M.

Diagnosis of students zone proximal development on math design instruction: A Rasch analysis

Alizamar A., Ardi Z., Daharnis D., Erlinda L., Ifdil I., Prasetyaningtyas W.E., Rahim R., Rangka I.B., Suranata K., Susiani K., Alizamar A., Ardi Z., Daharnis D., Erlinda L., Ifdil I., Prasetyaningtyas W.E., Rahim R., Rangka I.B., Suranata K., Susiani K.

The genesis of new mathematical knowledge as a social construction

Steinbring H.

The constructivist teaching experiment: illustrations and implications

Steffe L. P., Steffe L.P.

Toward a working model of constructivist teaching: A reaction to Simon

D'Ambrosio B. S., Steffe L. P.

Understanding Vygotsky’s zone of proximal development for learning

Silalahi R. M.

Applications of Vygotsky’s sociocultural approach for teachers’ professional development

Shabani K.

Exploring ChatGPT-Facilitated Scaffolding in Undergraduates' Mathematical Problem Solving

He X., Li Y., Li Y., Fang J., Xiao X., Zhou R., Fan Q.

Journal of Computer Assisted Learning

How Students Use Cognitive Structures to Process Information in the Algebraic Reasoning?

Dwijanto, Isnarto, Basir M.A., Waluya S.B.

European Journal of Educational Research

A Systematic Review on Geometric Thinking: A Review Research Between 2017-2021

Kharisudin I., Sukestiyarno Y.L., Trimurtini, Waluya S.B.

European Journal of Educational Research

Access to Document